Towards Assurance of LLM Adversarial Robustness using Ontology-Driven Argumentation

Tomas Bueno Momcilovic, Beat Buesser, Giulio Zizzo, Mark Purcell, Dian Balta
10/10/2024
cs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Despite the impressive adaptability of large language models (LLMs), challenges remain in ensuring their security, transparency, and interpretability. Given their susceptibility to adversarial attacks, LLMs need to be defended with an evolving combination of adversarial training and guardrails. However, managing the implicit and heterogeneous knowledge for continuously assuring robustness is difficult. We introduce a novel approach for assurance of the adversarial robustness of LLMs based on formal argumentation. Using ontologies for formalization, we structure state-of-the-art attacks and defenses, facilitating the creation of a human-readable assurance case, and a machine-readable representation. We demonstrate its application with examples in English language and code translation tasks, and provide implications for theory and practice, by targeting engineers, data scientists, users, and auditors.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{momcilovic2024towards,
  title  = {Towards Assurance of LLM Adversarial Robustness using Ontology-Driven Argumentation},
  author = {Tomas Bueno Momcilovic and Beat Buesser and Giulio Zizzo and Mark Purcell and Dian Balta},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.07962},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07962v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.07962.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.07962)

Discussion