Evaluating GPT-4 at Grading Handwritten Solutions in Math Exams

Adriana Caraeni, Alexander Scarlatos, Andrew Lan
11/7/2024
cs.CYcs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have shown promise in accurately grading open-ended student responses. However, few prior works have explored grading handwritten responses due to a lack of data and the challenge of combining visual and textual information. In this work, we leverage state-of-the-art multi-modal AI models, in particular GPT-4o, to automatically grade handwritten responses to college-level math exams. Using real student responses to questions in a probability theory exam, we evaluate GPT-4o's alignment with ground-truth scores from human graders using various prompting techniques. We find that while providing rubrics improves alignment, the model's overall accuracy is still too low for real-world settings, showing there is significant room for growth in this task.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{caraeni2024evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating GPT-4 at Grading Handwritten Solutions in Math Exams},
  author = {Adriana Caraeni and Alexander Scarlatos and Andrew Lan},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2411.05231},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05231v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2411.05231.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2411.05231)

Discussion