Multi-Step Reasoning in Korean and the Emergent Mirage

Guijin Son, Hyunwoo Ko, Dasol Choi
1/10/2025
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We introduce HRMCR (HAE-RAE Multi-Step Commonsense Reasoning), a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' ability to perform multi-step reasoning in culturally specific contexts, focusing on Korean. The questions are automatically generated via templates and algorithms, requiring LLMs to integrate Korean cultural knowledge into sequential reasoning steps. Consistent with prior observations on emergent abilities, our experiments reveal that models trained on fewer than \(2 \cdot 10^{25}\) training FLOPs struggle to solve any questions, showing near-zero performance. Beyond this threshold, performance improves sharply. State-of-the-art models (e.g., O1) still score under 50\%, underscoring the difficulty of our tasks. Notably, stepwise analysis suggests the observed emergent behavior may stem from compounding errors across multiple steps rather than reflecting a genuinely new capability. We publicly release the benchmark and commit to regularly updating the dataset to prevent contamination.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{son2025multistep,
  title  = {Multi-Step Reasoning in Korean and the Emergent Mirage},
  author = {Guijin Son and Hyunwoo Ko and Dasol Choi},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2501.05712},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05712v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2501.05712.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2501.05712)

Discussion