Ko-MuSR: A Multistep Soft Reasoning Benchmark for LLMs Capable of Understanding Korean

Chanwoo Park, Suyoung Park, JiA Kang, Jongyeon Park, Sangho Kim +4 more
10/28/2025
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: mcrl/Ko-MuSR (0 stars, MIT, last commit 2025-10-31).

Abstract

We present Ko-MuSR, the first benchmark to comprehensively evaluate multistep, soft reasoning in long Korean narratives while minimizing data contamination. Built following MuSR, Ko-MuSR features fully Korean narratives, reasoning chains, and multiple-choice questions verified by human annotators for logical consistency and answerability. Evaluations of four large language models -- two multilingual and two Korean-specialized -- show that multilingual models outperform Korean-focused ones even in Korean reasoning tasks, indicating cross-lingual generalization of reasoning ability. Carefully designed prompting strategies, which combine few-shot examples, reasoning traces, and task-specific hints, further boost accuracy, approaching human-level performance. Ko-MuSR offers a solid foundation for advancing Korean NLP by enabling systematic evaluation of long-context reasoning and prompting strategies.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

mcrl/Ko-MuSRCommunity62%
MIT

Code distribution for arXiv paper: Ko-MuSR: A Multistep Soft Reasoning Benchmark for LLMs Capable of Understanding Korean

00Shell, PythonOct 14, 202511 months agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{park2025komusr,
  title  = {Ko-MuSR: A Multistep Soft Reasoning Benchmark for LLMs Capable of Understanding Korean},
  author = {Chanwoo Park and Suyoung Park and JiA Kang and Jongyeon Park and Sangho Kim and Hyunji M. Park and Sumin Bae and Mingyu Kang and Jaejin Lee},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.24150},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24150v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.24150.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.24150)

Discussion