On Neural BRDFs: A Thorough Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches

Florian Hofherr, Bjoern Haefner, Daniel Cremers
2/21/2025
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) is an essential tool to capture the complex interaction of light and matter. Recently, several works have employed neural methods for BRDF modeling, following various strategies, ranging from utilizing existing parametric models to purely neural parametrizations. While all methods yield impressive results, a comprehensive comparison of the different approaches is missing in the literature. In this work, we present a thorough evaluation of several approaches, including results for qualitative and quantitative reconstruction quality and an analysis of reciprocity and energy conservation. Moreover, we propose two extensions that can be added to existing approaches: A novel additive combination strategy for neural BRDFs that split the reflectance into a diffuse and a specular part, and an input mapping that ensures reciprocity exactly by construction, while previous approaches only ensure it by soft constraints.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hofherr2025neural,
  title  = {On Neural BRDFs: A Thorough Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches},
  author = {Florian Hofherr and Bjoern Haefner and Daniel Cremers},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2502.15480},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15480v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2502.15480.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2502.15480)

Discussion