Understanding Nonlinear Implicit Bias via Region Counts in Input Space

Jingwei Li, Jing Xu, Zifan Wang, Huishuai Zhang, Jingzhao Zhang
5/16/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

One explanation for the strong generalization ability of neural networks is implicit bias. Yet, the definition and mechanism of implicit bias in non-linear contexts remains little understood. In this work, we propose to characterize implicit bias by the count of connected regions in the input space with the same predicted label. Compared with parameter-dependent metrics (e.g., norm or normalized margin), region count can be better adapted to nonlinear, overparameterized models, because it is determined by the function mapping and is invariant to reparametrization. Empirically, we found that small region counts align with geometrically simple decision boundaries and correlate well with good generalization performance. We also observe that good hyper-parameter choices such as larger learning rates and smaller batch sizes can induce small region counts. We further establish the theoretical connections and explain how larger learning rate can induce small region counts in neural networks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2025understanding,
  title  = {Understanding Nonlinear Implicit Bias via Region Counts in Input Space},
  author = {Jingwei Li and Jing Xu and Zifan Wang and Huishuai Zhang and Jingzhao Zhang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2505.11370},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11370v3},
  journal = {ICML 2025 2025}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2505.11370.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2505.11370)

Discussion