A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for predicting probabilities of default

Adrian Iulian Cristescu, Matteo Giordano
6/24/2025
q-fin.RMcs.LGstat.AP

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Predicting the probability of default (PD) of prospective loans is a critical objective for financial institutions. In recent years, machine learning (ML) algorithms have achieved remarkable success across a wide variety of prediction tasks; yet, they remain relatively underutilised in credit risk analysis. This paper highlights the opportunities that ML algorithms offer to this field by comparing the performance of five predictive models-Random Forests, Decision Trees, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting and AdaBoost-to the predominantly used logistic regression, over a benchmark dataset from Scheule et al. (Credit Risk Analytics: The R Companion). Our findings underscore the strengths and weaknesses of each method, providing valuable insights into the most effective ML algorithms for PD prediction in the context of loan portfolios.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cristescu2025comparative,
  title  = {A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for predicting probabilities of default},
  author = {Adrian Iulian Cristescu and Matteo Giordano},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2506.19789},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19789v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2506.19789.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2506.19789)

Discussion