Trustworthy AI: UK Air Traffic Control Revisited

Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield
7/25/2025
cs.CYcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Exploring the socio-technical challenges confronting the adoption of AI in organisational settings is something that has so far been largely absent from the related literature. In particular, research into requirements for trustworthy AI typically overlooks how people deal with the problems of trust in the tools that they use as part of their everyday work practices. This article presents some findings from an ongoing ethnographic study of how current tools are used in air traffic control work and what it reveals about requirements for trustworthy AI in air traffic control and other safety-critical application domains.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Enriching Moral Perspectives on AI: Concepts of Trust amongst Africans

80% match2025

Trustworthy XAI and Application

80% match2024

World Models: The Safety Perspective

79% match2024

Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions

79% match2024

Can We Trust AI Agents? A Case Study of an LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for Ethical AI

78% match2024

Bridging Ethical Principles and Algorithmic Methods: An Alternative Approach for Assessing Trustworthiness in AI Systems

77% match2025

Cite this paper

@article{procter2025trustworthy,
  title  = {Trustworthy AI: UK Air Traffic Control Revisited},
  author = {Rob Procter and Mark Rouncefield},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2507.21169},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21169v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2507.21169.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2507.21169)

Discussion