Finding Holes: Pathologist Level Performance Using AI for Cribriform Morphology Detection in Prostate Cancer

Kelvin Szolnoky, Anders Blilie, Nita Mulliqi, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Hemamali Samaratunga +21 more
10/15/2025
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Background: Cribriform morphology in prostate cancer is a histological feature that indicates poor prognosis and contraindicates active surveillance. However, it remains underreported and subject to significant interobserver variability amongst pathologists. We aimed to develop and validate an AI-based system to improve cribriform pattern detection. Methods: We created a deep learning model using an EfficientNetV2-S encoder with multiple instance learning for end-to-end whole-slide classification. The model was trained on 640 digitised prostate core needle biopsies from 430 patients, collected across three cohorts. It was validated internally (261 slides from 171 patients) and externally (266 slides, 104 patients from three independent cohorts). Internal validation cohorts included laboratories or scanners from the development set, while external cohorts used completely independent instruments and laboratories. Annotations were provided by three expert uropathologists with known high concordance. Additionally, we conducted an inter-rater analysis and compared the model's performance against nine expert uropathologists on 88 slides from the internal validation cohort. Results: The model showed strong internal validation performance (AUC: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99; Cohen's kappa: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.89) and robust external validation (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.93; Cohen's kappa: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.45-0.64). In our inter-rater analysis, the model achieved the highest average agreement (Cohen's kappa: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.57-0.74), outperforming all nine pathologists whose Cohen's kappas ranged from 0.35 to 0.62. Conclusion: Our AI model demonstrates pathologist-level performance for cribriform morphology detection in prostate cancer. This approach could enhance diagnostic reliability, standardise reporting, and improve treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{szolnoky2025finding,
  title  = {Finding Holes: Pathologist Level Performance Using AI for Cribriform Morphology Detection in Prostate Cancer},
  author = {Kelvin Szolnoky and Anders Blilie and Nita Mulliqi and Toyonori Tsuzuki and Hemamali Samaratunga and Matteo Titus and Xiaoyi Ji and Sol Erika Boman and Einar Gudlaugsson and Svein Reidar Kjosavik and José Asenjo and Marcello Gambacorta and Paolo Libretti and Marcin Braun and Radisław Kordek and Roman Łowicki and Brett Delahunt and Kenneth A. Iczkowski and Theo van der Kwast and Geert J. L. H. van Leenders and Katia R. M. Leite and Chin-Chen Pan and Emiel Adrianus Maria Janssen and Martin Eklund and Lars Egevad and Kimmo Kartasalo},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.13995},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13995v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.13995.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.13995)

Discussion