Uncertainty Quantification for Regression: A Unified Framework based on kernel scores

Christopher Bülte, Yusuf Sale, Gitta Kutyniok, Eyke Hüllermeier
10/29/2025
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Regression tasks, notably in safety-critical domains, require proper uncertainty quantification, yet the literature remains largely classification-focused. In this light, we introduce a family of measures for total, aleatoric, and epistemic uncertainty based on proper scoring rules, with a particular emphasis on kernel scores. The framework unifies several well-known measures and provides a principled recipe for designing new ones whose behavior, such as tail sensitivity, robustness, and out-of-distribution responsiveness, is governed by the choice of kernel. We prove explicit correspondences between kernel-score characteristics and downstream behavior, yielding concrete design guidelines for task-specific measures. Extensive experiments demonstrate that these measures are effective in downstream tasks and reveal clear trade-offs among instantiations, including robustness and out-of-distribution detection performance.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{blte2025uncertainty,
  title  = {Uncertainty Quantification for Regression: A Unified Framework based on kernel scores},
  author = {Christopher Bülte and Yusuf Sale and Gitta Kutyniok and Eyke Hüllermeier},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2510.25599},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25599v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2510.25599.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2510.25599)

Discussion