Correcting Mean Bias in Text Embeddings: A Refined Renormalization with Training-Free Improvements on MMTEB

Xingyu Ren, Youran Sun, Haoyu Liang
11/14/2025
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We find that current text embedding models produce outputs with a consistent bias, i.e., each embedding vector $e$ can be decomposed as $\tilde{e} + μ$, where $μ$ is almost identical across all sentences. We propose a plug-and-play, training-free and lightweight solution called Renormalization. Through extensive experiments, we show that renormalization consistently and statistically significantly improves the performance of existing models on the Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark (MMTEB). In particular, across 38 models, renormalization improves performance by 9.7 $σ$ on retrieval tasks, 3.1 $σ$ on classification tasks, and 0.8 $σ$ on other types of tasks. Renormalization has two variants: directly subtracting $μ$ from $e$, or subtracting the projection of $e$ onto $μ$. We theoretically predict that the latter performs better, and our experiments confirm this prediction.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ren2025correcting,
  title  = {Correcting Mean Bias in Text Embeddings: A Refined Renormalization with Training-Free Improvements on MMTEB},
  author = {Xingyu Ren and Youran Sun and Haoyu Liang},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.11041},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11041v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2511.11041.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2511.11041)

Discussion