Evaluating Small Decoder-Only Language Models for Grammar Correction and Text Simplification

Anthony Lamelas
1/7/2026
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models have become extremely popular recently due to their ability to achieve strong performance on a variety of tasks, such as text generation and rewriting, but their size and computation cost make them difficult to access, deploy, and secure in many settings. This paper investigates whether small, decoder-only language models can provide an efficient alternative for the tasks of grammar correction and text simplification. The experiments in this paper focus on testing small language models out of the box, fine-tuned, and run sequentially on the JFLEG and ASSET datasets using established metrics. The results show that while SLMs may learn certain behaviors well, their performance remains below strong baselines and current LLMs. The results also show that SLMs struggle with retaining meaning and hallucinations. These findings suggest that despite their efficiency advantages, current SLMs are not yet competitive enough with modern LLMs for rewriting, and further advances in training are required for SLMs to close the performance gap between them and today's LLMs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lamelas2026evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating Small Decoder-Only Language Models for Grammar Correction and Text Simplification},
  author = {Anthony Lamelas},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.03874},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03874v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.03874.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.03874)

Discussion