Simplify-This: A Comparative Analysis of Prompt-Based and Fine-Tuned LLMs

Eilam Cohen, Itamar Bul, Danielle Inbar, Omri Loewenbach
1/9/2026
cs.CLcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: eilamc14/Simplify-This (3 stars, last commit 2026-02-03).

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) enable strong text generation, and in general there is a practical tradeoff between fine-tuning and prompt engineering. We introduce Simplify-This, a comparative study evaluating both paradigms for text simplification with encoder-decoder LLMs across multiple benchmarks, using a range of evaluation metrics. Fine-tuned models consistently deliver stronger structural simplification, whereas prompting often attains higher semantic similarity scores yet tends to copy inputs. A human evaluation favors fine-tuned outputs overall. We release code, a cleaned derivative dataset used in our study, checkpoints of fine-tuned models, and prompt templates to facilitate reproducibility and future work.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Comparative Analysis of Prompt-Based and Fine-Tuned LLMs

30Jupyter NotebookSep 23, 20258 months agoNOASSERTION
datasetfine-tuninghuggingfacemachine-learningnlp

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cohen2026simplifythis,
  title  = {Simplify-This: A Comparative Analysis of Prompt-Based and Fine-Tuned LLMs},
  author = {Eilam Cohen and Itamar Bul and Danielle Inbar and Omri Loewenbach},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2601.05794},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05794v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2601.05794.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2601.05794)

Discussion