Constructing Synthetic Instruction Datasets for Improving Reasoning in Domain-Specific LLMs: A Case Study in the Japanese Financial Domain

Yuma Okochi, Fabio Milentiansen Sim, Tomoyasu Okada
3/2/2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In adapting LLMs to specific domains, achieving both domain expertise and reasoning ability remains an urgent challenge. This study proposes a general method for constructing high-quality synthetic instruction data for any domain, starting from domain-specific vocabulary. As a demonstration, we applied this method to the financial domain and constructed a large-scale instruction dataset totaling approximately 9.5 billion tokens with Chain-of-Thought reasoning traces. Evaluation results confirmed performance improvements over baseline models on financial benchmarks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach. We also report findings on the impact of reasoning trace length on performance and its limitations. Lastly, we open-source our models and datasets on https://huggingface.co/nri-ai .

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{okochi2026constructing,
  title  = {Constructing Synthetic Instruction Datasets for Improving Reasoning in Domain-Specific LLMs: A Case Study in the Japanese Financial Domain},
  author = {Yuma Okochi and Fabio Milentiansen Sim and Tomoyasu Okada},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.01353},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01353v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.01353.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.01353)

Discussion