On the Structural Failure of Chamfer Distance in 3D Shape Optimization

Chang-Yong Song, David Hyde
3/10/2026
cs.CVcs.GR

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Chamfer distance is the standard training loss for point cloud reconstruction, completion, and generation, yet directly optimizing it can produce worse Chamfer values than not optimizing it at all. We show that this paradoxical failure is gradient-structural. The per-point Chamfer gradient creates a many-to-one collapse that is the unique attractor of the forward term and cannot be resolved by any local regularizer, including repulsion, smoothness, and density-aware re-weighting. We derive a necessary condition for collapse suppression: coupling must propagate beyond local neighborhoods. In a controlled 2D setting, shared-basis deformation suppresses collapse by providing global coupling; in 3D shape morphing, a differentiable MPM prior instantiates the same principle, consistently reducing the Chamfer gap across 20 directed pairs with a 2.5$\times$ improvement on the topologically complex dragon. The presence or absence of non-local coupling determines whether Chamfer optimization succeeds or collapses. This provides a practical design criterion for any pipeline that optimizes point-level distance metrics.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{song2026structural,
  title  = {On the Structural Failure of Chamfer Distance in 3D Shape Optimization},
  author = {Chang-Yong Song and David Hyde},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2603.09925},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09925v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2603.09925.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2603.09925)

Discussion