Learning to Play Blackjack: A Curriculum Learning Perspective

Amirreza Alasti, Efe Erdal, Yücel Celik, Theresa Eimer
3/31/2026
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents often struggle with efficiency and performance in complex environments. We propose a novel framework that uses a Large Language Model (LLM) to dynamically generate a curriculum over available actions, enabling the agent to incorporate each action individually. We apply this framework to the game of Blackjack, where the LLM creates a multi-stage training path that progressively introduces complex actions to a Tabular Q-Learning and a Deep Q-Network (DQN) agent. Our evaluation in a realistic 8-deck simulation over 10 independent runs demonstrates significant performance gains over standard training methods. The curriculum-based approach increases the DQN agent's average win rate from 43.97% to 47.41%, reduces the average bust rate from 32.9% to 28.0%, and accelerates the overall workflow by over 74%, with the agent's full training completing faster than the baseline's evaluation phase alone. These results validate that LLM-guided curricula can build more effective, robust, and efficient RL agents.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{alasti2026learning,
  title  = {Learning to Play Blackjack: A Curriculum Learning Perspective},
  author = {Amirreza Alasti and Efe Erdal and Yücel Celik and Theresa Eimer},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2604.00076},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00076v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2604.00076.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2604.00076)

Discussion