The impact of postediting on AI generative translation in Yemeni context: Translating literary prose by ChatGPT

Nasim Al-wagieh, Mohammed Q. Shormani
4/17/2026
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This study examines the role of artificial intelligence in translation, focusing on ChatGPT, specifically ChatGPT-4, and the extent to which human postediting is required in literary translation. A mixed-method approach was adopted, involving 30 professional translators who evaluated and postedited AI-generated translations of selected Arabic and English literary texts. The results show that although AI improves translation speed and accessibility, it remains limited in handling cultural, stylistic, and figurative aspects of language. Participants generally confirmed the necessity of human postediting, particularly in novels and drama. The findings indicate that emerging human-machine collaboration model rather than replacement of human translators. The study concludes that AI should be used as a supportive tool, while human expertise remains essential for ensuring translation quality and cultural appropriateness.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{alwagieh2026impact,
  title  = {The impact of postediting on AI generative translation in Yemeni context: Translating literary prose by ChatGPT},
  author = {Nasim Al-wagieh and Mohammed Q. Shormani},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2604.16704},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16704v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2604.16704.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2604.16704)

Discussion