Evaluating the Effects of AI Directors for Quest Selection

Kristen K. Yu, Matthew Guzdial, Nathan Sturtevant
9/30/2024
cs.HCcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Modern commercial games are designed for mass appeal, not for individual players, but there is a unique opportunity in video games to better fit the individual through adapting game elements. In this paper, we focus on AI Directors, systems which can dynamically modify a game, that personalize the player experience to match the player's preference. In the past, some AI Director studies have provided inconclusive results, so their effect on player experience is not clear. We take three AI Directors and directly compare them in a human subject study to test their effectiveness on quest selection. Our results show that a non-random AI Director provides a better player experience than a random AI Director.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yu2024evaluating,
  title  = {Evaluating the Effects of AI Directors for Quest Selection},
  author = {Kristen K. Yu and Matthew Guzdial and Nathan Sturtevant},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2410.03733},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03733v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2410.03733.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2410.03733)

Discussion